ReconDock By Kdairatchi
Go To ReconDock
MyRepo
MyRepo
  • Pastebin Services
  • Awesome Ai Talk
  • Bug Bounty Testing, Techniques, and Tools
  • Cybersources
  • Targets
  • Bug checklist
  • Bug Bounty Platforms
  • Awesome Bug Bounty Tips Awesome
    • CVE Exploits and PoC Collection
  • ============ Awesome Bugs
    • Awesome One-liner Bug Bounty
  • Awesome CS Courses
  • Awesome Cyber Co
  • Awesome Dev
  • Awesome Free Certs
  • Awesome Git
  • Awesome Github
  • Awesome Go
  • Awesome Interviews
  • Awesome Keys
  • Awesome Mac OpenSource
  • Awesome Mac
  • Awesome Python
    • Awesome Tool
  • Awesome-Selfhosted
    • Awesome Hacker Search Engines
  • Awesome Shell
  • Awesome Shodan Search Queries
  • Awesome Static Website Services Awesome
  • Awesome Vulnerable Applications
  • Awesome WAF
  • Awesome First PR Opportunities
  • Awesome-Bugbounty-Writeups
  • Awesome-web3-Security awesome
  • Bug-Bounty
  • CTF Tools
  • Awesome Blockchain Bug Bounty
  • Awesome Bug Bounty
  • awesome-design-systems
  • Awesome Google VRP Writeups
  • Web Scraping
  • awesome
  • bug-bounty-reference
  • the-book-of-secret-knowledge
  • APACHE
  • AWS
  • AZURE
  • CISCO
  • CLOUDFLARE
  • Cross Origin Resource Sharing (CORS)
  • CRLF Injection || HTTP Response Splitting
  • CSV Injection
  • Content Injection
  • CRLF Injection || HTTP Response Splitting
  • JENKINS
  • JIRA
  • LFI
  • OR
  • PostgreSQL Environment Variable Manipulation Vulnerability
  • RCE
  • Recon
  • SSRF
  • Proof OF Concept (POC): SharePoint Vulnerability Detection
  • Template Injection
  • WORDPRESS
  • XSLT Injection
  • XSS
  • XXE
  • Books
  • Firebase Subdomain Enumeration & PoC Testing
  • SQLI
  • Special Tools
  • Account Takeover
  • Authentication
  • Broken Link Hijacking
  • Business Logic Errors
  • Default Credentials
  • Email Spoofing
  • ExposedAPIkeys
  • ForgotPasswordFunctionality
  • JWT Vulnerabilities
  • OWASPTestingChecklist1
  • Tabnabbing
  • Web Cache Poisoning
  • Wordpress Endpoints to look
  • lfi_vulnerble_targets
  • (LFI)passwrd
  • LostSec
  • POCS
    • CVES
      • CVE-2021-36873
      • BreadcrumbsSQL_Injection_cve_2024
      • CVE-2024-0195
      • CVE-2024-29269 Exploit
  • 403-ByPass
  • Chat-bot_xss_payloads
  • burp
    • Match & Replace
    • Zap
  • cloudflare-waf-bypass
  • infosec
    • Customize the bash shell environments
    • automation
    • Website Ideas
  • 2FA bypass
  • Account Takeover
  • OWASP Web Application Security Testing Checklist
  • Projects
  • OWASP Top Ten
  • links
  • Bug Bounty Builder ¯\(ツ)/¯
  • Awesome
    • AllAboutBugBounty: All about bug bounty (bypasses, payloads, and etc)
  • Cheatsheets
  • Checklists
    • Here’s a clear, step by step breakdown of commands, tools, and objectives for each section in your Web Security Testing Guide (WSTG). Each test includes easy to follow commands, explanations, and examples where applicable.
  • Dorks
  • Scripts
  • Loads
  • OWASP
    • Checklist
  • ai
    • Ai Best for Information and Coding
  • Medium Recent Writeups
  • 🌟 Useful Extensions for Bug Bounty Hunting 🌟
  • Customize the bash shell environments
  • Fabric
    • Test Application Platform Configuration
  • Docker
  • Git auto
  • Bug Bounty Beginner's Roadmap
  • Methodology 2025
    • Advanced Recon Methodology
Powered by GitBook
On this page

OWASP Top Ten

PreviousProjectsNextlinks

Last updated 4 months ago

The OWASP Top 10 is a standard awareness document for developers and web application security. It represents a broad consensus about the most critical security risks to web applications.

Globally recognized by developers as the first step towards more secure coding.

Companies should adopt this document and start the process of ensuring that their web applications minimize these risks. Using the OWASP Top 10 is perhaps the most effective first step towards changing the software development culture within your organization into one that produces more secure code.

Top 10 Web Application Security Risks

There are three new categories, four categories with naming and scoping changes, and some consolidation in the Top 10 for 2021.

image

moves up from the fifth position; 94% of applications were tested for some form of broken access control. The 34 Common Weakness Enumerations (CWEs) mapped to Broken Access Control had more occurrences in applications than any other category.

shifts up one position to #2, previously known as Sensitive Data Exposure, which was broad symptom rather than a root cause. The renewed focus here is on failures related to cryptography which often leads to sensitive data exposure or system compromise.

slides down to the third position. 94% of the applications were tested for some form of injection, and the 33 CWEs mapped into this category have the second most occurrences in applications. Cross-site Scripting is now part of this category in this edition.

is a new category for 2021, with a focus on risks related to design flaws. If we genuinely want to "move left" as an industry, it calls for more use of threat modeling, secure design patterns and principles, and reference architectures.

moves up from #6 in the previous edition; 90% of applications were tested for some form of misconfiguration. With more shifts into highly configurable software, it's not surprising to see this category move up. The former category for XML External Entities (XXE) is now part of this category.

was previously titled Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities and is #2 in the Top 10 community survey, but also had enough data to make the Top 10 via data analysis. This category moves up from #9 in 2017 and is a known issue that we struggle to test and assess risk. It is the only category not to have any Common Vulnerability and Exposures (CVEs) mapped to the included CWEs, so a default exploit and impact weights of 5.0 are factored into their scores.

was previously Broken Authentication and is sliding down from the second position, and now includes CWEs that are more related to identification failures. This category is still an integral part of the Top 10, but the increased availability of standardized frameworks seems to be helping.

is a new category for 2021, focusing on making assumptions related to software updates, critical data, and CI/CD pipelines without verifying integrity. One of the highest weighted impacts from Common Vulnerability and Exposures/Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVE/CVSS) data mapped to the 10 CWEs in this category. Insecure Deserialization from 2017 is now a part of this larger category.

was previously Insufficient Logging & Monitoring and is added from the industry survey (#3), moving up from #10 previously. This category is expanded to include more types of failures, is challenging to test for, and isn't well represented in the CVE/CVSS data. However, failures in this category can directly impact visibility, incident alerting, and forensics.

is added from the Top 10 community survey (#1). The data shows a relatively low incidence rate with above average testing coverage, along with above-average ratings for Exploit and Impact potential. This category represents the scenario where the security community members are telling us this is important, even though it's not illustrated in the data at this time.

A01:2021-Broken Access Control
A02:2021-Cryptographic Failures
A03:2021-Injection
A04:2021-Insecure Design
A05:2021-Security Misconfiguration
A06:2021-Vulnerable and Outdated Components
A07:2021-Identification and Authentication Failures
A08:2021-Software and Data Integrity Failures
A09:2021-Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
A10:2021-Server-Side Request Forgery